Just as the world doesn’t all move to the beat of one drum, there are differing views on whether this mega cap technology leadership may continue.
On one hand, advisors that believe that this trend will persist point to mega cap stocks being household names for a reason. According to Morningstar, 17 of the top 20 names in the S&P 500 have a “wide” economic moat, characterized by high network effects, substantial intangible assets, cost advantages, high switching costs, or efficient scale which give them a competitive edge.5 And over the past year, the top 20 names have also seen revenue growth of 14.8% for the top 20 vs. 4.07% for the next 480 in the index.6
Considering these trends and the fact that the average U.S. Asset Manager Moderate Model Allocation and average active U.S. Large Blend fund have sizeable underweights to mega cap stocks7, some advisors may see this as an opportunity to add more mega cap exposure to their portfolios.
On the other hand, some advisors are currently taking stock of their allocations because higher returns from the largest companies have also been accompanied by higher risk. Relative to the more diversified S&P 500, a portfolio of the top 20 names has seen higher total risk over the past five years.8 Furthermore, smaller companies may benefit more from innovation through new technologies, and their earnings growth may be justification for further investment. In fact, based on a BlackRock study of over 23,000 portfolios, advisors are ~5-6% overweight small cap stocks within their equity allocation relative to the broad equity market benchmark.9 Advisors with this view may look to further diversify away from mega cap names and lean more into small companies.
Regardless of the view, advisors should consider being more intentional within their U.S. equity exposure in this environment.