2025 has started with a bang! Bond yields have been on a rollercoaster ride, spiking on inflation fears then cooling off then spiking again in February with hotter-than-expected CPI data, only to fall again as growth worries gripped the market more recently. The AI sensation DeepSeek threw a curveball at the equity markets, causing tech stocks to tumble just weeks after the S&P 500 hit record highs. Although we don’t see this as a major near-term risk to AI capex investment, it’s a reminder that the competitive dynamics are very real, and investors should be wary of the high expectations embedded into current prices. Moreover, the new administration's tariff announcements have kept the markets on their toes.
Amid uncertainty, income can be a more predictable driver of total return than price appreciation alone given the greater consistency of dividend and coupon payments. For investors in their retirement phase, its particularly important to consider an income-generating portfolio to meet spending needs so as to mitigate the risk of ‘dollar cost ravaging,’ the concept of running out of principal to fund retirement spending. In these uncertain times, the Multi-Asset Income Fund and model portfolios are seeking to take advantage of fluctuating yields and unexpected market moves to generate attractive returns. So, where does this leave our outlooks and asset class views for the rest of the year…?
On growth: Consensus expectations for 2025 are optimistic, contrasting with the more cautious outlooks of 2023 and 2024. Consumption over the past two years has been powered by strong job growth coupled with robust wage growth. We expect both to slow as this year wears on. Additionally, some of the key pillars of corporate investment (e.g. manufacturing structures, transportation and IT equipment) are showing signs of fatigue, and there isn’t a clear candidate to pickup the slack. A higher starting point means there is a greater potential for disappointment, so we remain more balanced in our risk taking (vs. prior years), having built more diversifying exposures into the strategy creating the space to add risk on market pullbacks.
Evolution of US real GDP growth forecasts
Forward-looking estimates may not come to pass. For illustration purposes only.
Source: Bloomberg as of 1/15/2025. Displays the median forecasted probability of US Real GDP with forecasts derived from the latest monthly & quarterly surveys conducted by Bloomberg and from forecasts submitted by various banks.
On Equities: AI innovation is now better reflected in Mag 7* earnings forecasts, with continued double-digit growth expected for 2025 but lower than the past two years. Conversely, earnings growth expectations for the S&P more broadly are expected to be higher this year than last. As this earnings convergence plays out, we expect strong returns from areas that have lagged over the last few years and now benefit from more attractive valuations. We believe US dividend growth stocks will deliver accelerating earnings growth this year and are well-positioned to benefit from a broadening in equity market performance. For income investors, what this means is potential price upside on top of already attractive dividends from these companies.
Earnings growth broadening out
Earnings growth projections represented by Bloomberg estimates, reflecting the consensus earnings growth across sell-side analyst estimates. Source: Reuters, BofA, as of December 31, 2024. Asterisks indicate economist projections. There is no guarantee that such projections will come to pass. For illustrative purposes only. Views subject to change.
With lower return expectations for equity markets in 2025 (due to elevated valuations), covered calls provide another attractive way to balance income generation with upside capture, thereby enhancing overall portfolio yield and returns. In the Multi-Asset Income Fund, for example, we write covered call options on individual stocks, monetizing market volatility to drive additional income. Currently, covered calls represent 15% of the Fund’s exposure but drive 36% of the overall yield. The other benefit of this approach also allows our strategies to benefit from areas in the equity market that are underrepresented in traditional dividend-oriented equity strategies.
On Credit: Spreads are very tight for both investment grade (IG) bonds (88bp) and high yield (HY) bonds (290bp), reflecting low default rates, favorable economic conditions, and strong corporate earnings. Most returns will come from coupon payments due to limited room for price appreciation. Emphasizing income with a risk-adjusted focus helps minimizes volatility in this environment.
We are focusing on floating rate exposures, preferring loans over HY due to high carry and lower volatility. AAA-rated CLOs (collateralized loan obligations) remain an attractive part of the fixed income universe that continues to perform well. In US IG, we prefer the intermediate part of the curve, as the yield premium for extending duration is insufficient given low overall spreads and a flat credit curve.
Source: Bloomberg as of 2/28/2025. US High Yield represented by the Bloomberg US High Yield 2% Issuer Capped Index. Indexes are unmanaged and one cannot invest directly in an index. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Spread is defined as the Index OAS to Treasury: the constant spread that when added to all discount rates from the treasury curve on the binomial interest rate tree model (used by the indices) will make the theoretical value of the future cash flows equal to the market price of the instrument.
Another way to deliver a differentiated source of income is by considering option strategies on credit fixed income assets. These strategies, known as Fixed Income BuyWrites, offer attractive monthly cash flow through the sale of at- or near-the-money call options while offering some downside protection in a down market via the premium earned from sale of the call option.
Rate markets have been volatile this year. 10y treasury yields peaked at 4.79% in January before falling sharply. A shock CPI print in February then sent yields higher again. Unlike prior years, we expect rates markets to broadly drift sideways in 2025 with volatility offering opportunities for tactical trades. On the positive side, expectations for Fed easing are more realistic, but the possibility of greater fiscal deficits (and the ensuing treasury supply) could push yields higher depending on government fiscal priorities.
As we progress through 2025, we stay adaptable in our approach and committed to being dynamic to effectively manage risks and capitalize on opportunities. Diversifying income-producing instruments is a wise strategy to secure stable yields and achieve competitive returns.
To obtain more information on the fund(s) including the Morningstar time period ratings and standardized average annual total returns as of the most recent calendar quarter and current month end, please click on the fund tile.
The Morningstar RatingTM for funds, or "star rating", is calculated for managed products (including mutual funds, variable annuity and variable life subaccounts, exchange-traded funds, closed-end funds, and separate accounts) with at least a three-year history. Exchange-traded funds and open-ended mutual funds are considered a single population for comparative purposes. It is calculated based on a Morningstar Risk-Adjusted Return measure (excluding any applicable sales charges) that accounts for variation in a managed product's monthly excess performance, placing more emphasis on downward variations and rewarding consistent performance. The top 10% of products in each product category receive 5 stars, the next 22.5% receive 4 stars, the next 35% receive 3 stars, the next 22.5% receive 2 stars, and the bottom 10% receive 1 star. The Overall Morningstar Rating for a managed product is derived from a weighted average of the performance figures associated with its three-, five-, and 10-year 60-119 months of total returns, and 50% 10-year rating/30% five-year rating/20% three-year rating for 120 or more months of total returns. While the 10-year overall star rating formula seems to give the most weight to the 10-year period, the most recent three-year period actually has the greatest impact because it is included in all three rating periods.
Performance data shown represents past performance and is no guarantee of future results.