24 Mar 2014

BlackRock Investment Institute

 

 

There are no free lunches in investing. Yet two types of stocks have outperformed in the long run: small (versus large) caps and value (versus growth) equities. The performance of these traditional equities investment styles has been anything but consistent (nobody said making money was easy).

Against a backdrop of small cap outperformance and a value versus growth stalemate, we debated the prospects for the traditional style boxes in equity investing. Our main conclusions:

  • Style exposures are key drivers of portfolio returns because different investment styles can outperform (or underperform) for prolonged periods of time.
  • Think outside the box. It pays to understand the content of a style box, and how it changes over time. Sector weights within investment styles can shift dramatically. This is important, because industry sectors behave differently in different economic conditions.
  • Small caps today are pushing against historic valuation ranges by most metrics. Yet Low for Longer interest rates, below-average operating margins and rising merger and acquisition (M&A) activity suggest further potential upside.
  • Global growth equities today are slightly cheaper than value compared with historical valuations. The valuation gap between growth and value has hit a decade high in Europe, however, potentially setting markets up for a value revival.

The outperformance of small caps and value equities is a much-debated anomaly in finance. The evidence is clear—at least in the very long run: U.S. small caps racked up an average annual return of 12% from 1926 through 2013, 2.4 percentage points more than large caps, according to Fama French data. This may seem like small fry, but it means a 6.5-fold difference in total return when compounded over almost a century.

This phenomenon is similar to the power of reinvested dividends over very long time periods. Other factors such as earnings and sentiment swamp dividends over shorter horizons.

Similarly, “cheap” stocks with low price-to-book ratios (value) have delivered cumulative returns of 5,000% since 1980 in the United States, versus a near 3,000% return for “growth” stocks with high price-to-book ratios, according to Russell data.

 

The Style Cycle

Issued in Hong Kong by BlackRock Asset Management North Asia Limited. This material has not been reviewed by the Securities and Futures Commission. Investment involves risks. Past performance is not a guide to future performance. There is no guarantee that any forecasts made will come to pass. Reliance upon information in this material is at the sole discretion of the reader. This material is not intended to be relied upon as a forecast, research or investment advice, and is not a recommendation, offer or solicitation to buy or sell any securities or to adopt any investment strategy. Any opinions contained herein, which reflect our judgment at this date, and may change as subsequent conditions vary. The information and opinions contained in this material are derived from proprietary and non-proprietary sources deemed by BlackRock to be reliable, are not necessarily all-inclusive and are not guaranteed as to accuracy. This material is for informational purposes only and does not constitute an offer or invitation to anyone to invest in any BlackRock fund and has not been prepared in connection with any such offer. Any research in this material has been procured and may have been acted on by BlackRock for its own purpose. The results of such research are being made available only incidentally. BlackRock® are registered trademarks of BlackRock, Inc. All other trademarks, servicemarks or registered trademarks are the property of their respective owners. ©2014 BlackRock Inc. All rights reserved.