EXPERT INSIGHT FORM BLACKROCK FUNDAMENTAL EQUITIES

Investing beyond benchmarks: The case for unconstrained equities

Market indexes can be a useful barometer of long-term performance. But the investment opportunity set need not start and end there. Fundamental Equities investor Alister Hibbert uses an unconstrained approach in seeking to identify those rare companies that stand out from the pack.

Capital at risk. The value of investments and the income from them can fall as well as rise and are not guaranteed. Investors may not get back the amount originally invested. Any opinions or forecasts represent an assessment of the market environment at a specific time and is not a guarantee of future results. This information should not be relied upon by the reader as research, investment advice or a recommendation.


Key takeaways

  • An unconstrained equity strategy uses a benchmark-agnostic approach in seeking to assemble a portfolio of market-leading stocks.
  • Fundamental-based analysis drives investment decisions and results in high-conviction positions with potential to outgrow the market across time.
  • It’s a long-term, differentiated approach in a market we believe is increasingly dominated by short-termism.

What is unconstrained equity investing?

An unconstrained investing approach gives professional portfolio managers the ability to construct a portfolio free from the prescriptions and dispositions of a market benchmark. The aim is to build a differentiated portfolio of investments with the potential to provide outcomes that are distinct from that offered by the broader market.

Alister Hibbert, Head of the Strategic Equity Team within BlackRock Fundamental Equities, describes benchmarks as an “artificial construct” when it comes to stock selection. His approach to unconstrained investing entails not simply tilting away from a benchmark but starting from “a blank sheet of paper to build the very best portfolio we can based on individual company analysis.”

The opportunity to apply that analysis and parse potential winners and losers is compelling today, in our view, given wide market dispersion. The chart below shows the percent of high-growth versus low-growth companies in the MSCI World Index across time, with the current gap large enough to suggest potential for skilled stock picking to generate outperformance.

All stocks are not created equal
Revenue growth dispersion among global equities, 1996-2023

Chart showing the dispersion in revenue growth among companies in the MSCI World Index across time.

Sources: Datastream, I/B/E/S and Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research, as of Dec. 31, 2023. Chart shows revenue growth as represented by fiscal year (FY) 3 sales growth estimates for companies in the MSCI World Index. The figures shown relate to past performance. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of current or future results. Index performance returns do not reflect any management fees, transaction costs or expenses. Indices are unmanaged and one cannot invest directly in an index.

Because relatively few businesses meet the strict criteria that Mr. Hibbert and his team seek, they typically invest in just 20-30 companies with the goal of maintaining their positions across time to fully benefit from what they view as exceptional long-term growth prospects.

“We aim to give our investments the time to compound their returns while avoiding the distraction of short-term opportunism,” he says. The team prioritizes a deep focus on company fundamentals that ignores the daily distractions of benchmark noise and the temptation to trade on near-term news flow.

And in fact, history suggests it is company fundamentals, such as earnings growth and dividends, that account for the lion’s share of return across time. See chart below.

Fundamentals have driven long-term return
MSCI World Index sources of return, 1989-2023

Chart showing sources of return for the MSCI World Index across time.

Sources: BlackRock Investment Institute, Refinitiv Datastream, as of Dec. 31, 2023. Chart shows returns with dividends reinvested. The figures shown relate to past performance. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of current or future results. Index performance returns do not reflect any management fees, transaction costs or expenses. Indices are unmanaged and one cannot invest directly in an index.

Does greater concentration mean greater risk?

A smaller group of holdings does imply that declines in any one can have a larger impact on overall portfolio return. Yet the inherent nature of an active approach seeks to mitigate this risk by allowing portfolio managers to center their research intensity on what they see as the highest-potential stocks.

In the funds Mr. Hibbert oversees, his stance is one of a long-term business stakeholder willing to weather short-term hiccups in pursuit of long-term outperformance. “Truly great businesses dominate industries over multiple years, not quarters,” he says.

Yet the team’s rigorous approach to fundamental research means they will disinvest if the structural outlook for a business and, therefore, the long-term investment thesis deteriorates.

Why now for a high-conviction, unconstrained approach?

In recent decades, new investment vehicles alongside information abundance, rapid processing times and human attention constraints have all contributed to a shortening of investment periods in public equity markets. In many ways, it defies the age-old wisdom in “time in” versus “timing” the markets ― because despite a broader tendency toward shortening, the long-term power of compounding remains intact. This creates mispricing, in our  view ― and an opportunity for long-term investors to capitalize. Heightened dispersion in the growth outlook for businesses also helps to make this a favorable environment for fundamental-based stock pickers.

An unconstrained, high-conviction approach like the one Mr. Hibbert describes can apply a long-term lens to identify those rare companies that are market leaders today and have the underlying business strength to remain leaders 10 years from now. It’s a differentiated approach in a market we believe is increasingly dominated by opportunism and short-termism.

Investors looking to outsource stock selection might favor such a portfolio, or those who are already broadly diversified and seeking a new source of risk and return to complement their broader portfolio.

As useful as benchmarks are, there is great thinking and investment capability to be realized beyond their borders. An unconstrained approach can help unlock that untold potential.

There can be no guarantee that an unconstrained approach can be successful and the value of investments may go down as well as up.

Alister Hibbert

Managing Director, BlackRock Fundamental Equities.

Mr. Hibbert is founder and co-portfolio manager of the BlackRock Strategic Equity Hedge Fund Strategy. He is also founder and co-portfolio manager of the BlackRock Global Unconstrained Equity Strategy.