BY CLICKING ON “I AGREE”, I DECLARE I AM A WHOLESALE CLIENT AS DEFINED IN THE CORPORATIONS ACT 2001.
What is a Wholesale Client?
A person or entity is a “wholesale client” if they satisfy the requirements of section 761G of the Corporations Act.
This commonly includes a person or entity:
Greater Dispersion
The increase in macro and market volatility is widening the gap between top- and bottom-quartile managers, amplifying the impact on investor portfolios.
Extensive Resources
Alpha is scarce, and finding managers that will generate it consistently requires significant resources and expertise, both upfront and on an ongoing basis.
Better Outcomes
The need for active managers to deliver alpha becomes ever more critical to achieving desired portfolio outcomes when market returns are muted.
Financial markets are adjusting to a new regime where the BlackRock Investment Institute expects a bigger role for active strategies in portfolios. For investors capable of identifying top-performing managers, the rewards will likely be greater than in the previous regime. However, the ability to persistently capture excess returns is more challenging than ever.
The decade leading up to the pandemic was a golden era for risk assets, where broad market returns across asset classes marched steadily higher. But the Great Moderation – an even longer stretch of stable growth and performance – is over. Macro uncertainty has surged since the onset of the pandemic, marked by the end of Quantitative Easing, negative or low interest rates, and subdued inflation. Together with accelerating secular shifts (e.g., technological disruption, geopolitical fragmentation, demographic transitions), financial markets have reflected a substantial uptick in volatility across asset classes.
A new regime is underway, characterized by greater uncertainty, volatility, and dispersion in returns. We believe this environment will produce more opportunities for alpha-seeking strategies to deliver active returns. However, not all active managers benefit equally. In fact, while the spread between top- and bottom-performing funds has expanded, the median excess performance of actively managed funds remains largely unchanged in many strategies, despite the more attractive backdrop.
Identifying top-performing managers ex-ante is difficult and labor-intensive, given the breadth of manager universes across asset classes. Vast amounts of quantitative and qualitative data need to be understood and evaluated, requiring significant resources and depth of expertise. Yet in an environment where expectations for market returns are no longer as positive or stable, active strategies that can generate strong and reliable alpha streams will provide valuable sources of excess return and diversification.
Selecting the best managers – those that will consistently outperform peers – will be paramount in this new regime. And those with the ability to find and secure investments with these managers, stand to deliver better portfolio outcomes.
The new regime of heightened macro and market volatility has translated into greater uncertainty, leading to higher dispersion of returns. Structural mega forces, such as demographic changes and emergent technologies like artificial intelligence, are having a profound impact on corporate fundamentals, amplifying winners and losers, and increasing the magnitude of market dispersion. As a result, there is greater uncertainty amongst economic forecasters on data like inflation, which is stoking market volatility and broadening return dispersion.
With less clarity among market participants on the path forward, we see more scope for skilled managers to outperform. Yet the risks associated with, and the importance of avoiding, underperforming managers are also more meaningful. The “Greater Dispersion” chart below shows the last decade of return dispersion amongst hedge funds and illustrates how the forces of the new regime have shifted this spread higher since 2020, relative to the preceding six years. As dispersion has become more pronounced, the preference for active strategies hinges on the ability to reliably pick top-performing managers.
Source: Hedge Fund Research, ©HFR, Inc., 1 April 2024
The sheer breadth of funds and associated materials to ingest underscores the magnitude of this endeavor. Those adept at utilizing technology and data, together with the fundamental insights required to take informed views on manager skill, will be best positioned to reliably pick top-tier funds that can deliver strong and persistent alpha.
Unlike broadly investible index or factor products, alpha is scarce, difficult to identify, and subject to great variability. While alpha is ultimately a function of an investment team’s skill, the ability to derive this excess return is often dependent on the efficiency of markets. Market inefficiency tends to spike in volatile and uncertain times, enabling skilled managers to capitalize on a wider array of mispricing. Sources of alpha vary, and factor or market timing can be a form of active management capable of generating excess returns; but regardless of how it is generated, alpha generally offers the most consistent source of excess return.
Putting these insights into a portfolio context and referencing the BlackRock Investment Institute’s latest capital market assumptions (CMAs), we note broad market performance is unlikely to provide the same level of return that investors experienced over recent years. When market returns are compressed, the contribution of every basis point towards total returns is magnified. Allocating more to alpha is one way in which investors can make up some of this return shortfall.
For example, US equities annualized 15.7% over the five-year period ending December 31, 2023. However, BlackRock forecasts US equities to return 4.0% per annum over the next five years. Assuming a consistent alpha stream of 1.5% above the market return over both five-year periods, a hypothetical active manager’s alpha contribution would jump from just 8.7% of total returns in the most recent period to 27.3% in the lower return environment.
Sources: S&P Global, BlackRock Investment Institute, 1 April 2024.
Our framework allows us to analyze the benefits of adding alpha into a portfolio, and assess the trade-offs between cost and complexity, as well as risk and return. By focusing on the measure of alpha in excess of persistent factor exposures, we can ensure the fees paid to active managers are truly a reward for their unique skill, as opposed to exposures that could be accessed through readily investible building blocks.
Identifying and evaluating managers capable of producing persistent alpha over the long run is complex and challenging. It demands a team approach backed by cross-functional expertise with personnel that have access to extensive data and insights, underpinned by cutting-edge technology. It can also be bolstered by a comprehensive understanding of the investment landscape, established professional networks, and experience across multiple market cycles.
We evaluate investment managers across multiple dimensions in an effort to identify and monitor those that possess competitive advantages relative to peers. Quantitative analytics form the backbone of our investment approach. By gathering granular data (e.g., position-level detail) from diverse sources and leveraging advanced risk systems to process it, portfolios can be assessed both in isolation and across their peer universes. However, we combine these quantitative insights with fundamentally driven investment views, which allow us to build out robust forward-looking assumptions that are not predicated on historical results alone.
At BlackRock, our dedicated Manager Research team is organized across investment functions and located around the world in order to canvas the vast universes of active managers across geographies and asset classes, both public and private. While we have groups dedicated to specific areas of focus, we emphasize the importance of integrating perspectives and collaborating on investment decisions across our areas of specialization. This commitment to close collaboration allows our team to challenge each other and arrive at joint conclusions.
We believe investment insight and expertise will be more important today than in the past several decades.
In hindsight, indexing strategies were the right choice in the decade following the Global Financial Crisis, a period of relatively stable market conditions and broad appreciation across asset classes. In such an environment, the benefits of simplicity and low fees for indexed strategies were undeniable, while the alpha impact on total returns was generally less meaningful. However, the investment landscape has shifted.
We see more opportunity for alpha generation in the new regime and the potential for that excess return to make a larger impact on portfolios. Active management comes with a cost, but net returns should ultimately be the benchmark of success and the potential return on resources allocated to alpha-seeking strategies is more compelling today.
In order to deliver better portfolio outcomes, selecting the most skilled managers will be critical. Given the breadth and depth of investible universes, as well as the dispersion within them, there is a substantial need for data and a high-caliber team to evaluate that information. Having the resources to access and process the multitude of underlying datapoints, combined with the investment expertise to put that information into context, is ultimately what is required to make an informed, initial decision. But the work does not stop at the time of initial investment. Ongoing monitoring necessitates the need to consistently re-underwrite allocations, as markets evolve and new information comes online.
All of this calls for a comprehensive approach to identify the best active managers - those that consistently anticipate and capitalize on idiosyncratic sources of return. It is these managers that we expect to outperform and persistently generate alpha irrespective of how markets evolve.