This section includes investor type descriptions for professional clients and market counterparties.
Professional client
A Professional Client is either: (i) a ‘deemed’ professional client; (ii) serviced-based professional client; or (iii) an assessed professional Client
(i) Deemed Professional Client
A person is a “deemed” professional client if the person is:
(ii) Service-based Professional Clients
A person is a ‘serviced-based’ professional client if
(iii) Assessed-based Professional Clients
Assessed-based professional clients can be either (i) individuals; or (ii) undertakings
Individuals
An individual (and associated joint account holders) would be classified as an ‘assessed-based professional client’ if:
Where there is a joint account in place, the secondary account holder must obtain confirmation in writing that investment decisions relating to the joint account are made for or on behalf of the secondary account holder
Undertakings
Undertakings, which are generally not individuals, would be classified as ‘assessed-based’ professional clients if it:
Market counterparties
A Market Counterparty is any person who is either:
Weekly video_20260330
Christopher Kaminker
Head of Sustainable Investment Research and Analytics
BlackRock Investment Institute
Header:
CAPITAL AT RISK. INVESTMENTS CAN RISE OR FALL IN VALUE. FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION IN THE US, CANADA, LATIN AMERICA, SELECT COUNTRIES IN EUROPE (SEE THE FULL DISCLAIMER), ISRAEL, SOUTH AFRICA, HONG KONG, SINGAPORE AND AUSTRALIA. FOR INSTITUTIONAL, PROFESSIONAL, AND QUALIFIED INVESTORS AND CLIENTS IN OTHER PERMITTED COUNTRIES.
Opening frame: What’s driving markets? Market take
Camera frame
The economic shock from the Middle East conflict is pushing governments to secure energy supply. Power demand from AI is also accelerating investment in energy infrastructure. Together, these forces are unlocking long-term, thematic opportunities.
Title slide: Mideast shock fuels investing themes
1: Highly exposed
Now, energy underpins economic activity around the world. Around 80% of the population lives in countries that are net oil importers, and 60% live in countries that import natural gas. That means disruptions from the Middle East conflict are having a global effect, rippling across markets and reinforcing the drive for energy security.
2: An uneven shock
But the shock is playing out unevenly. Europe and Asia both rely on imported liquefied natural gas. Europe has limited ability to reduce its demand. Japan and South Korea are more exposed to price swings and demand shifts. The US – a net exporter – is insulated but not immune.
3: Getting selective
AI is driving up demand for energy – but that demand is colliding with supply constraints on key materials like copper. This has led countries to reduce their reliance on a small set of LNG suppliers, prioritize local supply chains through circular economies, and ramp up electrification efforts powered through renewables, like solar with batteries.
To capture these trends, the investing horizon is key. Leadership in deployment doesn’t always translate into equity returns. In the near term, higher volatility and dispersion favor active approaches. Longer-term, we favor themes such as electrification and critical resources across public and private markets.
Outro: Here’s our Market take
Energy security and AI-driven demand are reinforcing each other. We favor active, thematic exposures to back these companies and capture the shifts as they play out – active fundamentally, active systematically and through infrastructure investment in private markets. We stay neutral across equities but stand ready to adjust quickly.
Closing frame: Read details: blackrock.com/weekly-commentary
The Middle East shock and rising AI-driven power demand are reinforcing energy security and supply chain resilience, unlocking thematic opportunities.
The S&P 500 fell for a fifth-straight week, the first time since 2022. We see elevated oil prices testing whether central banks can keep up with inflation.
We look to labor market data across the US, euro area and Japan this week for whether recent softness signals broader cooling or continued resilience.
The economic shock emanating from the Middle East conflict is intensifying governments’ push to secure energy supply and build resilient supply chains. AI-driven power demand is amplifying this by accelerating investment in energy infrastructure. We favor a multi-asset, active approach to tap into the resulting thematic opportunities across energy, infrastructure, AI, commodities and defense – and avoid big directional equity calls due to the conflict’s uncertain outcome.
Share of population living in net importers by fuel type, 2022
Source: BlackRock Investment Institute with data from Ember and International Energy Agency World Energy Balance, April 2025.
The Middle East conflict has led to a near-closure of the Strait of Hormuz, disrupting flows of oil and liquefied natural gas (LNG) shipments from the Gulf. This is reverberating far beyond the region as most of the world’s eight billion people live in countries that rely on imported energy. Around 80% live in countries that are net importers of oil, and roughly 60% in countries that import natural gas, according to International Energy Agency data. See the chart. In short: energy vulnerability is widespread and structural. This means disruptions in one region quickly transmit across markets, reinforcing the push for energy security. It also underscores the importance of approaching investments through a thematic lens, especially at times when high uncertainty about the conflict’s outcome makes it prudent to steer away from making large directional investments.
The shock is playing out unevenly across regions. Europe and Asia are both highly exposed to imported LNG, but in different ways: Europe has limited ability to reduce demand, while countries such as Japan and South Korea are exposed to price swings and demand adjustments. The US – a net energy exporter – is more insulated but not immune, as rising global oil prices raise domestic fuel costs. This divergence is driving different outcomes: Exporters are benefiting in the near term, whereas importers face growth and inflation pressures sooner. We are seeing a world shaped by supply play out in real time.
We particularly favor what we call “electro tech” – batteries, power electronics and electric motors at the core of AI, energy, infrastructure and defense. AI is not just powering demand; it is tightening links across energy, technology, utilities and infrastructure, pushing up electricity use and the need for power capacity. This is colliding with limited supply of key materials such as copper – especially in fast-growing battery storage. Countries are diversifying supply and expanding grids – supporting utilities, though with returns capped by regulation. They are also reducing reliance on a narrow set of LNG suppliers, keeping prices elevated for now as buyers pay for supply security. Governments are prioritizing local supply chains and energy buildout, with Germany and others accelerating wind auctions, and the UK restricting Chinese turbine supply. They are also ramping up renewables and storage as energy security assets, alongside recycling and efficiency efforts.
All this requires an “all-of-the-above” investing approach. Near-term, higher volatility and dispersion in stock returns favor active fundamental and systematic approaches. Over longer horizons, we favor gradually building positions in themes such as electrification and critical minerals such as copper, nickel and aluminum across public and private markets. We’re selective in renewables, being mindful of higher rates and the challenges of Chinese supply chains. China is a leader in renewables – but that doesn’t necessarily translate into leading equity performance. We like solar, storage and grid tech because it’s in high demand and quick to build. We see energy infrastructure offering stable, inflation-linked cash flows. We favor copper to tap into electrification build-out, even as its performance is subject to economic growth.
The Middle East conflict and AI-driven power demand reinforce our preference for active, thematic exposures to energy security and the AI theme. We recently dialed down risk but stand ready to adjust quickly.
The S&P 500 lost 2%, notching five-straight weekly losses for the first time since 2022. The index was also pacing for its worst month in a year amid hopes for de-escalation in the Mideast conflict. Jitters were also evident in rates, with US 10-year Treasury yields rising to 4.43%. Brent crude climbed to $112 per barrel. If prices don’t decline soon, we think the key question shifts from “will central banks be able to cut?” to “will their policy rates keep up with the rise in inflation?”.
We expect unemployment to remain broadly stable amid an influx of labor market data across the US, euro area and Japan. We look for indications that the labor market stays resilient despite recent signs of softening. In the US, the data figures will help assess whether last month’s weaker payrolls print signals broader labor market cooling or sector-specific drivers.
Past performance is not a reliable indicator of current or future results. Indexes are unmanaged and do not account for fees. It is not possible to invest directly in an index. Sources: BlackRock Investment Institute, with data from LSEG Datastream as of March 26, 2026. Notes: The two ends of the bars show the lowest and highest returns at any point year to date, and the dots represent current year-to-date returns. Emerging market (EM), high yield and global corporate investment grade (IG) returns are denominated in US dollars, and the rest in local currencies. Indexes or prices used are: spot Brent crude, ICE US Dollar Index (DXY), spot gold, spot bitcoin, MSCI Emerging Markets Index, MSCI Europe Index, LSEG Datastream 10-year benchmark government bond index (US, Germany and Italy), Bloomberg Global High Yield Index, J.P. Morgan EMBI Index, Bloomberg Global Corporate Index and MSCI USA Index.
Japan unemployment; China PMI
UK GDP
Global manufacturing PMI; EU unemployment
US unemployment
Read our past weekly commentaries here.
Our highest conviction views on six- to 12-month (tactical) and over five-year (strategic) horizons, March 2026
| Reasons | ||
|---|---|---|
| Tactical | ||
| Favor AI beneficiaries | Markets are increasingly focused on identifying companies exposed to AI disruption. We favor the physical infrastructure and equipment supporting the AI buildout – such as semiconductors, power and data center assets – that we think we stand to benefit no matter the winners or losers. | |
| Selected international exposures | We like hard-currency EM debt due to improved economic resilience, disciplined fiscal and monetary policy and a high ratio of commodities exporters. In Europe, we are overweight short-term European government bonds on valuation and favor equity sectors such as infrastructure. | |
| Evolving diversifiers | We suggest looking for a “plan B” portfolio hedge as long-dated US Treasuries no longer provide portfolio ballast – and to mind potential sentiment shifts. We like gold as a tactical play with idiosyncratic drivers but don’t see it as a long-term portfolio hedge. | |
| Strategic | ||
| Portfolio construction | We favor a scenario-based approach as AI winners and losers emerge. We lean on private markets and hedge funds for idiosyncratic return and to anchor portfolios in mega forces. | |
| Infrastructure equity and private credit | We find infrastructure equity valuations attractive and mega forces underpinning structural demand. We still like private credit but see dispersion ahead – highlighting the importance of manager selection. | |
| Beyond market cap benchmarks | We get granular in public markets. We favor DM government bonds outside the US Within equities, we favor EM over DM yet get selective in both. In EM, we like India which sits at the intersection of mega forces. In DM, we like Japan as mild inflation and corporate reforms brighten the outlook. | |
Note: Views are from a US dollar perspective, March 2026. This material represents an assessment of the market environment at a specific time and is not intended to be a forecast of future events or a guarantee of future results. This information should not be relied upon by the reader as research or investment advice regarding any particular funds, strategy or security.
Six- to 12-month tactical views on selected assets vs. broad global asset classes by level of conviction, March 2026

We have lengthened our tactical investment horizon back to six to 12 months. The table below reflects this and, importantly, leaves aside the opportunity for alpha, or the potential to generate above-benchmark returns – especially at a time of heightened volatility.
| Asset | Tactical view | Commentary | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Developed markets | ||||||
| United States | We are neutral. Higher interest rate expectations could weigh on the market – and small caps in particular. We keep our overweight to companies that benefit from the AI mega force. | |||||
| Europe | We are neutral. We are neutral. Europe’s high exposure to the energy shock from the Mideast conflict makes it vulnerable to higher inflation and lower growth. | |||||
| UK | We are neutral. Valuations remain attractive relative to the US, but we see few near-term catalysts to trigger a shift. | |||||
| Japan | We are neutral. Japan’s exposure to imported energy may erode strong equity gains powered by healthy corporate balance sheets and governance reforms. | |||||
| Emerging markets | We are neutral. Economic resilience has improved, yet selectivity is key. We see opportunities across EM linked to AI and the energy transition and see the rewiring of supply chains benefiting countries like Mexico, Brazil and Vietnam. | |||||
| China | We are neutral. Trade relations with the US have steadied, but property stress and an aging population still constrain the macro outlook. Relatively resilient activity limits near-term policy urgency. We like sectors like AI, automation and power generation. We still favor China tech within our neutral view. | |||||
| Fixed income | ||||||
| Short US Treasuries | We are neutral. Shorter-term bonds are relatively attractive as the market has woken up to persistent inflation and higher rates. | |||||
| Long US Treasuries | We are underweight. Yields already faced upward pressure from rising term premia, as investors demand more compensation for the risk of holding long-term debt. The recent energy price shock compounds this by aggravating pre-existing inflationary pressures. | |||||
| Global inflation-linked bonds | We are neutral. The supply shock from the Middle East conflict adds to inflationary pressures, but also could drag on growth. | |||||
| Euro area government bonds | We are overweight short-term European government bonds to add a cash buffer, given the rapid repricing of expectations of ECB rate hikes. | |||||
| UK Gilts | We are neutral. The recent budget aims to shore up market confidence through fiscal consolidation. But deferred borrowing cuts could bring back gilt market volatility. | |||||
| Japanese government bonds | We are underweight. Rate hikes, higher global term premium and heavy bond issuance will likely drive yields up further. | |||||
| China government bonds | We are neutral. China bonds offer stability and diversification but developed market yields are higher and investor sentiment shifting towards equities limits upside. | |||||
| US agency MBS | We are overweight. Agency MBS offer higher income than Treasuries with similar risk and may offer more diversification amid fiscal and inflationary pressures. | |||||
| Short-term IG credit | We are neutral. Corporate strength means spreads are low, but they could widen if issuance increases and investors rotate into US Treasuries as the Fed cuts. | |||||
| Long-term IG credit | We are underweight. We prefer short-term bonds less exposed to interest rate risk over long-term bonds. | |||||
| Global high yield | We are neutral. High yield offers more attractive carry in an environment where growth is holding up – but we think dispersion between higher and weaker issuers will increase. | |||||
| Asia credit | We are neutral. Overall yields are attractive and fundamentals are solid, but spreads are tight. | |||||
| Emerging hard currency | We are overweight. EM hard-currency indexes lean towards Latin American commodity exporters such as Brazil that stand to benefit as Mideast supply plummets. | |||||
| Emerging local currency | We are neutral. The US dollar has been strengthening as a safe-haven currency in the wake of the Middle East conflict. This could reverse year-to-date gains driven by a falling USD. | |||||
Past performance is not a reliable indicator of current or future results. It is not possible to invest directly in an index. Note: Views are from a US dollar perspective. This material represents an assessment of the market environment at a specific time and is not intended to be a forecast or guarantee of future results. This information should not be relied upon as investment advice regarding any particular fund, strategy or security.
Six to 12-month tactical views on selected assets vs. broad global asset classes by level of conviction, March 2026

| Asset | Tactical view | Commentary | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equities | ||||
| Europe ex UK | We are neutral. We would need to see more business-friendly policy and deeper capital markets for recent outperformance to continue and to justify a broad overweight. We stay selective, favoring financials, utilities and healthcare. | |||
| Germany | We are neutral. Increased spending on defense and infrastructure could boost the corporate sector. But valuations rose significantly in 2025 and 2026 earnings revisions for other countries are outpacing Germany. | |||
| France | We are neutral. Political uncertainty could continue to drag corporate earnings behind peer markets. Yet some major French firms are shielded from domestic weakness, as foreign activity accounts for most of their revenues and operations. | |||
| Italy | We are neutral. Valuations are supportive relative to peers. Yet we think the growth and earnings outperformance that characterized 2022-2023 is unlikely to persist as fiscal consolidation continues and the impact of prior stimulus peters out. | |||
| Spain | We are overweight. Valuations and earnings growth are supportive relative to peers. Financials, utilities and infrastructure stocks stand to gain from a strong economic backdrop and advancements in AI. High exposure to fast-growing areas like emerging markets is also supportive. | |||
| Netherlands | We are neutral. Technology and semiconductors feature heavily in the Dutch stock market, but that’s offset by other sectors seeing less favorable valuations and a weaker earnings outlook than European peers. | |||
| Switzerland | We are neutral. Valuations have improved, but the earnings outlook is weaker than other European markets. If global risk appetite stays strong, the index’s tilt to stable, less volatile sectors may weigh on performance. | |||
| UK | We are neutral. Valuations remain attractive relative to the U.S., but we see few near-term catalysts to trigger a shift. | |||
| Fixed income | ||||
| Euro area government bonds | We are neutral. Yields are attractive, and term premium has risen closer to our expectations relative to US Treasuries. Peripheral bond yields have converged closer to core yields. | |||
| German bunds | We are neutral. Potential fiscal stimulus and bond issuance could push yields up, but we think market pricing reflects this possibility. Market expectations for near-term policy rates are also aligned with our view. | |||
| French OATs | We are neutral. France faces continued challenges from elevated political uncertainty, high budget deficits and slow structural reforms, but these risks already seem priced into OATs and we don’t expect a worsening from here. | |||
| Italian BTPs | We are neutral. The spread over German bunds looks tight given its large budget deficits and growing public debt. Domestic factors remain supportive, with growth holding up relative to the rest of the euro area and Italian households showing solid demand to hold BTPs at higher yields. Domestic political pushback likely prevents defense spending from rising to levels that would resurface fiscal stability concerns. | |||
| UK gilts | We are neutral. Gilt yields are off their highs, but we expect more market attention on long-term yields through the government’s November budget, given the difficulty it has had implementing spending cuts. | |||
| Swiss government bonds | We are neutral. Markets are expecting policy rates to return to negative territory, which we deem unlikely. | |||
| European inflation-protected securities | We are neutral. We see higher medium-term inflation, but inflation expectations are firmly anchored. Cooling inflation and uncertain growth may matter more near term. | |||
| European investment grade | We are neutral on European investment grade credit, favoring short- to medium-term paper for quality income. We prefer European investment grade over the US Quality-adjusted spreads have tightened significantly relative to the US, but they remain wider, and we see potential for further convergence. | |||
| European high yield | We are overweight. The income potential is attractive, and we prefer European high yield for its more appealing valuations, higher quality and less sensitivity to interest rate swings compared with the US Spreads adequately compensate for the risk of a potential rise in defaults, in our view. | |||
Past performance is not a reliable indicator of current or future results. It is not possible to invest directly in an index. Note: Views are from a euro perspective, March 2026. This material represents an assessment of the market environment at a specific time and is not intended to be a forecast or guarantee of future results. This information should not be relied upon as investment advice regarding any particular fund, strategy or security.
This material is for distribution to Professional Clients (as defined by the Financial Conduct Authority or MiFID Rules) and Qualified Investors only and should not be relied upon by any other persons.
Issued by BlackRock Investment Management (UK) Limited, authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. Registered office: 12 Throgmorton Avenue, London, EC2N 2DL. Tel: 020 7743 3000. Registered in England No. 2020394. For your protection telephone calls are usually recorded. BlackRock is a trading name of BlackRock Investment Management (UK) Limited.
Past performance is not a reliable indicator of current or future results and should not be the sole factor of consideration when selecting a product or strategy.
Capital at risk. The value of investments and the income from them can fall as well as rise and is not guaranteed. You may not get back the amount originally invested. Changes in the rates of exchange between currencies may cause the value of investments to diminish or increase. Fluctuation may be particularly marked in the case of a higher volatility fund and the value of an investment may fall suddenly and substantially. Levels and basis of taxation may change from time to time.
Any research in this document has been procured and may have been acted on by BlackRock for its own purpose. The results of such research are being made available only incidentally. The views expressed do not constitute investment or any other advice and are subject to change. They do not necessarily reflect the views of any company in the BlackRock Group or any part thereof and no assurances are made as to their accuracy.
This document is for information purposes only and does not constitute an offer or invitation to anyone to invest in any BlackRock funds and has not been prepared in connection with any such offer.
© 2026 BlackRock, Inc. All Rights reserved. BLACKROCK, BLACKROCK SOLUTIONS, iSHARES, BUILD ON BLACKROCK and SO WHAT DO I DO WITH MY MONEY logo are registered and unregistered trademarks of BlackRock, Inc. or its subsidiaries in the United States and elsewhere. All other trademarks are those of their respective owners.