BlackRock Greater Europe Investment Trust plc

About this investment trust

Capital at risk. The value of investments and the income from them can fall as well as rise and are not guaranteed. Investors may not get back the amount originally invested.

The Company aims to provide capital growth, primarily through investment in a focused portfolio constructed from a combination of the securities of large, mid and small capitalisation European companies, together with some investment in the developing markets of Europe.

Why choose it?

Europe is a rich source of innovation and dynamic capitalism. Active management can uncover its most exciting companies. The Trust invests in global brand leaders, plus smaller companies focused on niche, high growth areas. The Trust looks for high quality, well-capitalised companies with strong management teams that can create real value for shareholders over time. 

Suited to…

This Trust is designed for investors looking to invest in a selection of Europe’s highest quality, fastest-growing companies, irrespective of their size and geography. They must be willing to take on some additional risk to grow their capital over the long term.

Citywire: As at 16 November 2021.
Investment Week: As at 18 November 2021.
Kepler Rating: As at 1 January 2022.

What are the risks?

• Capital at risk. The value of investments and the income from them can fall as well as rise and are not guaranteed. Investors may not get back the amount originally invested.
• Overseas investment will be affected by movements in currency exchange rates.
• Emerging market investments are usually associated with higher investment risk than developed market investments. Therefore the value of these investments may be unpredictable and subject to greater variation.
• Investment strategies, such as borrowing, used by the Trust can result in even larger losses suffered when the value of the underlying investments fall.
• The Trust’s investments may have low liquidity which often causes the value of these investments to be less predictable. In extreme cases, the Trust may not be able to realise the investment at the latest market price or at a price considered fair.

Useful information

Capital at risk. The value of investments and the income from them can fall as well as rise and are not guaranteed. Investors may not get back the amount originally invested.

Fees & Charges

Sign up for Regulatory News Service alerts

To receive email alert notifications once an update to the Trust occurs, please sign up and select the updates you would like to receive via The Association of Investment Companies website here. Please be aware by clicking on this link you are leaving BlackRock and entering a third party’s website. As such, BlackRock is not liable for its content.

ESG Integration

Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) investing is often conflated or used interchangeably with the term “sustainable investing”. BlackRock has identified sustainable investing as being the overall framework and ESG as a data toolkit for identifying and informing our solutions. BlackRock has defined ESG Integration as the practice of incorporating material ESG information and consideration of sustainability risks into investment decisions in order to enhance risk-adjusted returns. BlackRock recognises the relevance of material ESG information across all asset classes and styles of portfolio management. The Investment Manager may incorporate sustainability considerations in its investment processes across all investment platforms. ESG information and sustainability risks are included as a consideration in investment research, portfolio construction, portfolio review, and investment stewardship processes.

The Investment Manager considers ESG insights and data, including sustainability risks, within the total set of information in its research process and makes a determination as to the materiality of such information in its investment process. ESG insights are not the sole consideration when making investment decisions and the extent to which ESG insights are considered during investment decision making will also be determined by the ESG characteristics or objectives of the Company. The Investment Manager’s evaluation of ESG data may be subjective and could change over time in light of emerging sustainability risks or changing market conditions. This approach is consistent with the Investment Manager’s regulatory duty to manage the Company in accordance with their investment objectives and policies and in the best interests of the Company’s investors. The Investment Manager’s Risk and Quantitative Analysis group will review portfolios to ensure that sustainability risks are considered regularly alongside traditional financial risks, that investment decisions are taken in light of relevant sustainability risks and that decisions exposing portfolios to sustainability risks are deliberate, and the risks diversified and scaled according to the investment objectives of the Company.

BlackRock’s approach to ESG integration is to broaden the total amount of information the Investment Manager considers with the aim of improving investment analysis and understanding the likely impact of sustainability risks on the Company’s investments. The Investment Manager assesses a variety of economic and financial indicators, which may include ESG data and insights, to make investment decisions appropriate for the Company objectives. This can include relevant third-party insights or data, internal research or engagement commentary and input from BlackRock Investment Stewardship.

Sustainability risks are identified at various steps of the investment process, where relevant, from research, allocation, selection, portfolio construction decisions, or management engagement, and are considered relative to the Company’s risk and return objectives. Assessment of these risks is done relative to their materiality (i.e. likeliness of impacting returns of the investment) and in tandem with other risk assessments (e.g. liquidity, valuation, etc.).

ESG integration does not change the Company’s investment objective or constrain the Investment Manager’s investable universe, and does not mean that an ESG or impact focused investment strategy or exclusionary screens have been or will be adopted by the Company. Similarly, ESG integration does not determine the extent to which the Company may be impacted by sustainability risks.

Fund manager commentary

30 June 2024

Comments from the portfolio managers

Please note that the commentary below includes historic information in respect of performance data in respect of portfolio investments, index performance data and the Company’s NAV performance.

The figures shown relate to past performance. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of current or future results.

During the month, the Company’s NAV rose by 0.7% and the share price declined by -1.4%. For reference, the FTSE World Europe ex UK Index returned -1.6% during the period.

French political uncertainty led to market volatility. President Macron called an unexpected election which led to concerns that a future government might come in with a less fiscally responsible agenda. While creating negative market sentiment in the near term, we think that a lack of clear mandate for either the French right-wing populist party RN or the left-wing means that there is a low chance that policies could have a significant direct negative impact on our portfolio holdings.

During the month we saw high quality, internationally exposed businesses outperform the market whilst particularly French-listed cyclicals and financials performed poorly. The technology sector delivered absolute positive returns given very limited impact from French election risk and continued positive messaging around the ‘AI investment wave’ coming.

The Company outperformed the reference index thanks to its positioning in technology and limited exposure to French domestic stocks, as well as an underweight to financials. Both sector allocation and stock selection contributed positively.

Semiconductors were amongst the top performers during June with shares in BE Semiconducter (Besi), ASMi and ASML all moving higher. The tone from management teams during roadshows was positive and all signs point to increased orders ahead. Besi hosted a Capital Markets Day in the month where their CEO reiterated a target model of over EUR 1bn sales over time (growing from EUR 580m in 2023).

A position in RELX was also additive in June. RELX has been consistent in confirming strong underlying trends, particularly on the back of AI trends in their legal division.

Owning Novo Nordisk contributed positively to active returns in June with the investment case continuing to progress well. To name a few of the headlines in the month, Wegovy prescription data in the US was strong, the company announced plans for an additional fill and finish site which continues to build significant capacity growth from 2026 and Wegovy was approved as an obesity treatment in China.

A position in Linde began to recover from recent weakness following Q1 2024 results which were solid yet seemed to disappoint the market with guidance which was only raised at the low end of the company’s range. We think management’s conservatism at Q1 is understandable and expect Linde to continue showing strong execution and proving their ability to grow earnings.

Elsewhere, avoiding European banks such as BNP and Banco Santander was helpful. The sector was dragged down by political volatility: BNP was particularly impacted by the French elections, whilst Santander was impacted by concerns around Brazil as well as an unexpected slowdown of rate cuts.

Shares in Chemometec fell in the month despite limited company specific updates, as the recovery in life sciences is yet to be seen. Having recently met with management we remain encouraged by the pivot in their strategy to one we believe is quite promising from a commercial perspective.

The portfolio’s holding in Kingspan detracted with shares selling off on the back of French political noise. The company generates close to 15% of revenues in France, but from our read of RN party policies there is nothing that would really impact the group negatively and thus the share price move (c. 10% down in the month) may be overdone. General construction weakness and softer commentary on recovery, with projects being delayed across the industry, also weighed on sentiment.

Not holding a few of the reference index large defensive assets, such as SAP, Roche and Novartis, detracted from relative returns as their shares outperformed the falling market.

Outlook

As economic momentum gathers pace and company guidance strikes a more optimistic tone, Europe has come into the spotlight. The European Central Bank’s decision to cut rates was taken positively, although the jury remains out on the speed rates fall from here. Whilst this rate change is positive for asset class sentiment, operationally we see limited impact on companies.

Rising political discontent, however, has been a thorn in the region’s side. Geopolitical tensions around tariffs and surprise elections in key economies such as the UK and France have added a degree of uncertainty. We take confidence in the changed regulatory landscape for banks in helping manage perceived contagion risk that could arise from potentially weaker fiscal positions and believe the negative impact of tariffs would only be meaningful for a small group of companies. Whilst uncertainty on policy outcomes remains, we believe the growth impact is likely limited in the near-term and economics should continue their positive inflection.

Long-term structural trends and large amounts of fiscal spending via the Recovery fund, Green Deal and the REPowerEU plan in Europe can also drive demand for years to come, for example in areas such as infrastructure, automation, innovation in medicines, the shift to electric vehicles, digitization, or decarbonisation. Valuations are attractive versus history and especially versus US equities. Overall, evidence of a resilient consumer, healthy corporate sector and decent outlooks underpinned by green stimulus should be supportive for the companies held in the portfolio.

Unless otherwise stated all data is sourced from BlackRock as of 30 June 2024

Any opinions or forecasts represent an assessment of the market environment at a specific time and is not intended to be a forecast of future events or a guarantee of future results. 

This information should not be relied upon by the reader as research, investment advice or a recommendation.

Risk: Reference to the names of each company in this communication is merely for explaining the investment strategy, and should not be construed as investment advice or investment recommendation of those companies.

Portfolio manager biography

Capital at risk. The value of investments and the income from them can fall as well as rise and are not guaranteed. Investors may not get back the amount originally invested.

Stefan Gries is co-manager of BlackRock Greater Europe Investment Trust plc. He is head of the European Equity team within the Fundamental Equity division of BlackRock’s Portfolio Management Group. He is co-manager on the European Absolute return (long/short) portfolios, as well as on Pan European and Europe ex UK long-only portfolios. Prior to joining BlackRock in 2008, Stefan spent two years at Scottish Widows Investment Partnership where he completed a two-year graduate programme. Since joining BlackRock, he has worked both as a portfolio manager and as an analyst covering, at various times, energy, pharmaceuticals and insurance on behalf of the European Equity team. He earned an MA in economics and Spanish from the University of St. Andrews in 2005.

Alexandra Dangoor is co-manager of BlackRock Greater Europe Investment Trust plc. Alexandra also has research responsibilities within the team’s financials research pod focused on the European banks and insurers. Alexandra joined the BlackRock Fundamental European Equity Team in 2019 after two years on BlackRock’s graduate rotation programme, where she was an analyst in the Natural Resources and European Equity teams. Alexandra earned a BSc degree in Mathematics and Economics at Bristol University, graduating in 2015, and an MSc in Investment and Wealth Management at Imperial College Business School, graduating in 2016. 

Board of directors

All the Directors are non-executive and independent of the Investment Manager. The Board as a whole constitutes the Audit and Management Engagement Committee.

Eric Sanderson (appointed April 2013) (Chairman) is a chartered accountant and a banker and was chief executive of British Linen Bank from 1989 to 1997 and a member of the management board of Bank of Scotland in his role as head of group treasury operations from 1997 to 1999. He was formerly chairman of MyTravel Group PLC, MWB Group Holdings, Dunedin Fund Managers Limited and Schroder UK Mid Cap Fund plc. He is presently chairman of JPMorgan Emerging Europe, Middle East & Africa Securities Limited.

Peter Baxter (appointed April 2015) has over 30 years’ experience in the investment management industry. He is an executive director of Snowball Impact Management Ltd, a social impact investment organisation, a non-executive director of Civitas Social Housing plc, and a trustee of Trust for London, and was a member of the Financial Reporting Council’s Conduct Committee. Previously he was chief executive of Old Mutual Asset Managers (UK) Ltd and worked for Schroders and Hill Samuel in a variety of investment roles.

Paola Subacchi (appointed July 2017) (Senior Independent Director) is an economist, writer and commentator on the functioning and governance of the international financial and monetary system. She is Professor of International Economics and Chair of the Advisory Board, Global Policy Institute, Queen Mary University of London, visiting professor at the University of Bologna, non-executive director of Scottish Mortgage Investment Trust PLC as well as Founder of Essential Economics Ltd. She writes regularly on Project Syndicate.

Ian Sayers (appointed February 2022) (Chairman of the Audit and Management Engagement Committee) is the former Chief Executive of the Association of Investment Companies (AIC), which he became in 2010 on his promotion from Deputy Director General. Prior to that, he was the AIC’s Technical Director, advising members on areas such as taxation, accounting, company law and regulation, as well as having a key role in its public affairs activity. He qualified as a chartered accountant and chartered tax advisor.

Sapna Shah (appointed 12 December 2023) has 20 years of investment banking experience advising UK companies, including listed REITs and investment companies, on IPOs, equity capital market transactions and mergers and acquisitions. She is a non-executive director of The Association of Investment Companies and a consultant at Panmure Gordon Limited. Prior to this she held senior investment banking roles at UBS AG, Oriel Securities (now Stifel Nicolaus Europe) and Cenkos Securities. She is currently a non-executive director of Supermarket Income REIT plc and BioPharma Credit PLC.