A bridge with backdrop of blue sky
Investment perspectives

Resiliency of private credit in insurance portfolios

A comparison of buy-and-hold credit experience for public credit, middle market lending, and HY infrastructure debt

Key points

01

Insurers are exposed to potential rating downgrades and credit losses that impact both realized investment yields and the insurers’ capital position.

02

In our view, Public HY currently does not offer sufficient yield to compensate insurers for the incremental capital and default costs of HY issuers unlike HY private debt.

03

Our report indicates credit losses are the more material risk to insurers’ RBC capital and realized yields when investing in HY vs. IG assets, where downgrades have had a more significant impact.

Due to multiple forces such as the historical low yield environment, reductions in traditional bank lending, and competitive industry pressures, we see insurers increasing their allocations to private market assets such as Private Credit. Using historical rating transition matrices from Moody’s and S&P, we examine the resiliency of private debt assets linked to infrastructure relative to debt linked to corporate entities. We show that High Yield (HY) Infrastructure may provide resiliency and diversification to insurance portfolios relative to corporate-linked debt such as Public HY and Middle Market Lending by estimating the impact of the negative credit experience on both an insurer’s Risk-Based Capital (RBC) ratio and the investments’ holding period capital and default-adjusted yield. 

The primary metric used to define resiliency in our analysis is “Lifetime Capital Consumption,” which in addition to an investment’s initial required capital also accounts for the incremental capital insurers would need to hold due to ratings downgrades and cumulative credit losses over the investment’s holding period. Our estimate of the “Lifetime Capital Consumption” is the primary input used in to estimate an illustrative RBC ratio decline, and capital/default-adjusted net yield across BBB Credit, Public HY, Middle Market Lending, and HY Infrastructure Debt.

Our analysis has three primary takeaways (1) HY Privates have offered enhanced yield and resiliency over BBB Credit and Public HY allocations, (2) within HY Privates, Infrastructure Debt may offer additional resiliency without sacrificing yield relative to Middle Market Lending, and (3) credit losses were a more meaningful contributor to negative credit experience in HY allocations, while in Investment Grade (IG) allocations, rating downgrades were more meaningful, which we show by examining the RBC ratio impact of an allocation to each asset class.

Contact our institutional team

Please click here to opt-in to receiving insight emails from BlackRock. Any data collected will be processed according to BlackRock's privacy policy. You may unsubscribe at any time.

*Required information | Read our Privacy policy

Thank you for reaching out!

A BlackRock representative will reach out shortly. In the meantime, explore our website to read insights on the markets, portfolio design and more.


Explore our insights hub