a crocodile glides through a water
Navigating the sea of troubles:

4 questions US institutional investors can no longer afford to ignore



1. How quickly can my portfolio react?

2. Do I have the necessary resources to access & manage alternatives?

3. Am I equipped to capitalize on the five mega forces?

4. How do I choose the best investment firm for me?

1. How quickly can my portfolio react?

The decade leading up to the pandemic was marked by low inflation, historically low interest rates and generally subdued volatility. In this new regime, markets move quickly and ignoring the shorter-term market backdrop may leave investors exposed.

That said, we believe investors who can take advantage of short-term market movements may position themselves to outperform. Remaining nimble in volatile markets can oftentimes be the difference maker between hitting or missing investment, liquidity, or funding objectives.

But that can be easier said than done. Institutions’ investment strategies are often built to meet long-term objectives, making portfolios somewhat inflexible by design. Moreover, challenges may also emerge with slow-moving, committee-based governance structures that make quick action nearly impossible, especially during periods of market volatility when demands from external stakeholders are at their highest.

We have found that more and more institutional investors have opted to engage with outside investment firms, seeking to harvest alpha from nimble strategies. Even for well-resourced institutions, collaborating externally can bring new perspectives or free up time for strategic priorities.

Case studies

Click through the examples below to see how our Multi-Asset Strategies & Solutions team helps clients construct and optimize dynamic solutions in the context of the whole portfolio.

two building painters
Spending needs

Designing a dynamic and operationally efficient solution

PROBLEM
  1. An endowment feared they'd fall short of their spending needs during a period of uncertainty. The client came to BlackRock to conduct a risk analysis, optimize for liquidity to meet 10-year spending schedule, and design a more flexible portfolio to avoid crystalizing large losses and ensure adequate capital at payouts during times of volatility.
red balloon flying higher than the rest
Enhancing returns

Integrating low-correlated, alpha-seeking strategies

PROBLEM
  1. A pension plan was looking to enhance returns in their public markets portfolio and capture value from shorter term market dislocations.
two stones leaning on each other
Plan funding

Constructing a nimble glide path

PROBLEM
  1. A medical organization and sponsor of a US Corporate Pension Plan was troubled by the plan’s low and volatile funding ratio (assets / liabilities) and were seeking a dynamic and operationally efficient investment solution that could put their plan on a path to fully funded while shifting investment risks according to their evolving return needs.
person holding umbrella
Portfolio resilience

Incorporating diversified, tactical strategies

PROBLEM
  1. A foundation with a strict governance structure was looking for additional ways to seek returns in their portfolio, given an extended period of underperformance and inflation pressures.

2. Do I have the necessary resources to access & manage alternatives?

In an economic landscape characterized by elevated macro uncertainties and escalating geopolitical risks, hitting investment objectives and annual spending targets may be increasingly difficult for institutional investors, prompting an evolution in traditional asset allocation.

According to BlackRock’s long-term capital markets assumptions,1 a global 70/30 portfolio is now expected to return 6.5% annually. Per our recent research on endowments and foundations, which typically target a risk-free rate plus 4%-5%, the 70/30 portfolio would underperform the target return by 100-300 basis points, depending on the organization’s investment objectives.

In parallel, the classic portfolio mix of stocks and bonds, a model historically marketed as a diversified approach to portfolio construction, has been dealt a blow in recent years. The correlation underpinning the classic 60/40 portfolio vanished at times, as stocks and bonds both declined in tandem, leaving investors few places to hide from market turmoil. And although inflation may continue to soften, the rising and positive correlation between stocks and bonds is a risk worth taking seriously.

Stocks and bonds have moved together when inflation is above target
Rolling 3-year correlation between S&P 500 and US Agg

Charts of correlation between stocks and bonds rises during the period of higher and lower inflation.

The figure shown relates to past performance. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of current or future results and should not be the sole factor of consideration when selecting a product or strategy. Source: BlackRock with data from Refinitiv Datastream, MSCI, and Morningstar Direct as of 30 September 2024. Agg refers to the Bloomberg US Aggregate Bond Index. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results. Indexes are unmanaged, are used for illustrative purposes only and are not intended to be indicative of any fund’s performance. It is not possible to invest directly in an index. 

Given these trends, we believe investors who thoughtfully complement public and private market allocations will be better positioned to participate on the upside while limiting losses during downturns, especially during such a unique time for private market investing.

Despite their potential benefits, the alternatives space is broad and characterized by a range of costs, liquidity profiles, and opportunities to generate returns. And understanding where a particular alternative investment may fit in a portfolio can present immense challenges.

We find that investing in alternatives requires a global information advantage, a wide breadth of implementation tools, and sophisticated risk technology to size positions appropriately. When done prudently, it can be an important option to target uncorrelated additional return.

Case studies

Click through the examples below to see how our Multi-Asset Strategies & Solutions platform helps clients construct and optimize alternative investments in the context of the whole portfolio.

blocks growing
Enhancing allocations

Incorporating bespoke satellite credit strategies

PROBLEM
  1. A sovereign wealth fund client sought to evolve their private credit allocation. Help was needed to source, select, and construct a portfolio of managers that could potentially provide complementary, uncorrelated exposure to their broader portfolio and core credit exposure, as well as access to opportunities that offered idiosyncratic returns.
different color umbrellas
Private markets

Designing a diversified, private markets solution

PROBLEM
  1. A Family Office was struggling to capture enough excess return to meet their clients’ unique liquidity needs, time horizon, and risk and return objectives through public markets alone. The client sought to build a cost-efficient, dynamic portfolio across public and private markets.
paint brush
Portfolio efficiency

Introducing complementary sources of active risk

PROBLEM
  1. Despite a strong balance sheet and operating performance, a prominent healthcare system with a static, all-public markets portfolio sought to increase their expected returns through more diversified risk premiums to adequately support planned capital projects.
distinct egg
Liquid alternatives

Implementing a liquid alternative strategy

PROBLEM

In building an active target date fund suite, a BlackRock portfolio management team sought to improve diversification beyond traditional stock and bond exposures. The team was looking for a strategy that could target absolute return in all market environments and increase portfolio resilience in an environment of elevated stock/bond correlations.

 

3. Am I equipped to capitalize on the five mega forces?

Before we explore a few investment applications on the five ‘mega forces,’ a simpler question comes first: What do we mean by ‘mega forces?’

We define mega forces as big, structural influences that affect investing today and in the future, creating major opportunities – and risks – for investors. In other words, each mega force represents change: A key driver of change.

That said, as economies grow and markets evolve, we believe the following five mega forces are poised to create shifts in profitability across economies and sectors:

1.

Digital disruption and artificial intelligence

Generative AI-based solutions could streamline operations, improve customer experience, and enable new capabilities. Tech firms are already pivoting their businesses around generative AI. We see opportunities across other sectors and a potentially transformative impact on profitability and productivity. Managing data privacy and cybersecurity risks will likely become increasingly important.

Video Player is loading.
Current Time 0:00
Loaded: 0%

[00:00:04.98] Our team has been using machine learning, a subset of AI, to enhance our investment and decision-making process for several years now. Machines are generally great at identifying patterns, adapting to new information, and processing large amounts of data at scale. And so logically, recent advancements in natural language processing have further improved our ability to interpret and extract insights from large volumes of text data.

[00:00:28.58] So in terms of AI in the investment process, we have found a variety use cases to be particularly interesting.

[00:00:35.19] One is Predictive Analytics, where we apply machine learning models to analyze large datasets to predict future market movements.

[00:00:43.09] So for example, a big driver of future stock prices is future profits and growth. So each day on Wall Street, thousands of analysts provide forecasts on fundamentals like earnings, sales, and updated analyst expectations. So these forecasts are very closely watched by investors, therefore, we track these forecasts across nearly 90 countries very closely, which is a lot of data to sift through.

[00:01:03.62] So using AI, we developed a Natural Language Processing signal that seeks to extract certain features from that data such as patterns in investor sentiment or risk appetite to ultimately offer different, market-movement predictions.

[00:01:16.30] Another application of Large Language Models is to identify the dominant themes in markets and from there build customized baskets of stocks that are complementary to that theme such as AI beneficiaries or defense stocks.

[00:01:28.36] A second use case we focus on is Data Validation. “Garbage in, garbage out” we like to call it. We invest a lot of time, money, talent, and resources to develop our signals, all of which are subject to rigorous testing, review, and team debate before being put into production on behalf of our client portfolios. Data integrity is crucial. If the data that trains and feeds the models is flawed or incomplete -- the output can be compromised. AI assists in data validation by identifying and adjusting anomalies in our input data, which is crucial for the accuracy of our quantitative models.

[00:02:08.12] While machines are great at consuming large amounts of data, they don't understand it. Even the most sophisticated Generative AI models just don't “get” it. Yet, they are spectacularly good at guessing. So we build proprietary, systematic signals that form the foundation of our decision-making. So these signals encapsulate and generalize our knowledge as seasoned investors and because we build the signals, we're well aware of their strengths and weaknesses and when and how they should be applied. So as sophisticated as AI and broader computing is these days, it still can't reliably or sustainably run a high-conviction portfolio without human supervision and intervention, when needed.

[00:02:43.88] So machines will struggle with predicting and properly estimating the risks of “edge” cases, or unique situations that fall outside its training data. So for example, if you train a

fixed income signal over a historical period where inflation has been benign and interest rates have steadily decreased, it can struggle when it gets new data post the pandemic that is very unlike anything it has seen before. So and as we know, it's usually those types of unprecedented events and dynamic market regimes that can make or break your portfolio and are the most important times to have a human hand on the wheel.

[00:03:19.63] One is Biases in your model. AI models have biases based on the data they've been trained on and the assumptions that were used in the model's construction. Examples of biases on input data may include earnings transcripts painting a rosy picture of the future, or the public speeches of most CEOs that tend to be more optimistic in nature. So, if you apply sentiment analysis to an earnings transcript without accounting for the positive bias, then you may not get the result you expect. Another risk is the Overfitting of models. As investors, we are essentially trying to predict the future. And yet markets are often driven by short term psychology, external events, and random fluctuations. As such, all of this 'noise' may mask the more meaningful information that a quant process seeks to capture. But the model doesn't know this. It just looks for the pattern in the data even if the data is dominated by noise. So the result of this could be an overfitted model that looks strong when applied to historical data but fails to deliver robust performance when fed with new data or a new regime that it hasn't seen before. And so it's important to understand the implicit assumptions being made and the sensibility beneath the data and not just get wrapped up in a historical back-test.

[00:04:28.58] And lastly, the risk of Transparency or interpretability. So as helpful as models and cleverly designed quantitative signals can be, there can also be a bit of a “black box” element on how exactly some of the models come to their conclusion. It can be hard to build trust and confidence in an output if you don't have visibility into exactly how it was generated because of the models' complexity. So in the case of LLMs, 'hallucinations' are also a well-known risk, which is when the model, very confidently, produces very plausible-sounding nonsense.

[00:04:58.97] And so to close out, as investors, we need to account for these types of limitations when calibrating and using these types of signals. A balanced approach is crucial here, where AI can serve as a complement to human judgment, but never as a substitute.

An application from one of our investors.

Starring Lisa O’Connor

1. How can investors complement quantitative signals with AI?
2. At what stage of the investment process does human judgement come into play?
3. What are some mistakes to look out for?

2.

The future of finance

A fast-evolving investment landscape is changing how households and companies use cash, borrow, transact, and seek returns. We see these shifts benefiting savers, diversifying finance for borrowers, creating a more stable system, and opening up potential investment opportunities.

Video Player is loading.
Current Time 0:00
Loaded: 0%

[00:00:05.55] A Core-Satellite approach is a widely used portfolio management framework that groups a lower risk Core allocation with Satellite strategies that may enhance returns or provide diversification.

[00:00:17.02] Our team allocates to third party private credit funds. In the context of private credit, we consider sponsor backed direct lending strategies to be an appropriate core allocation, given the senior profile of the underlying loans and their consistent returns over time.

[00:00:32.31] Around the Core, we like to build a portfolio of complementary satellite allocations. Satellite strategies tend to be smaller firms that operate in a specific niche. Examples include asset based lending, music royalties, and litigation finance.

[00:00:54.37] We see three benefits of pursuing adding satellite strategies to a portfolio of direct lending managers. Number one, Return Enhancement. Number two, Risk Diversification. And number three, Portfolio Optionality. On Return Enhancement, satellite strategies like opportunistic lending, Mezzanine lending, or royalty strategies seek to achieve net returns of 15% plus, a premium of 300 to 500 basis points over traditional direct lending.

[00:01:22.71] On Risk Diversification, the big risk for Sponsor lending strategies is corporate credit risk, making them vulnerable to company specific and market level shocks. Satellite strategies, on the other hand, may be exposed to different risks that are uncorrelated from the business cycle or market environment. And lastly, for Portfolio Optionality, Satellite strategies offer more liquidity flexibility than sponsor backed direct lending. Many funds in this space can offer quarterly liquidity as opposed to the typical five to seven year lock required of sponsor backed direct lending funds. This enables an allocator to fine tune the size of their private credit allocation with more precision on a quarterly or yearly basis.

[00:02:05.29] Of course, investing in Satellite private credit strategies is not without risk. These strategies tend to be more niche than other forms of private credit and as a result, they tend to be less liquid since there is less of an active buyer base for similar exposure. In the event of a forced liquidation or secondary sale by the allocator, a steeper haircut may be required.

[00:02:34.11] Our clients generally fall into two camps. They’re either new to Private Credit and need us to build them a de-novo portfolio or they’re existing allocators to Private Credit Funds but need to enhance their allocation. For those newer to the asset class, we evaluate their objectives and constraints, like their liquidity needs, return targets, and distribution requirements, to decide the exact proportion of Core to Satellite exposures. For those that may have an existing allocation, we perform a portfolio diagnostic of their exposures to identify the current composition and risk profile of the portfolio. From there we work with the client to build a complementary portfolio that aligns with their return targets, as well as risk and diversification goals. One of the things about private credit that we’re most excited about today is how it is able to play a lot of roles in a portfolio. If a client is focused on maximizing returns and has a large illiquidity budget, we can build a solution for them. On the other hand, if they need regular distributions of income to cover certain expenses we can achieve this by prioritizing funds that are evergreen versus closed end or which have distribution share classes.

An application from one of our investors.

Starring Staten Hudson

1. What is a "core-satellite" approach to private credit?
2. What are some key, potential benefits of a core-satellite approach?
3. What are some key portfolio characteristics we consider before structuring a core-satellite strategy?

 

3.

Geopolitical fragmentation

Geopolitical fragmentation and mounting competition between countries are rewiring globalization. We see companies reconfiguring their supply chains to adapt to growing regulation and mitigate risk in their operations, often increasing costs. At the same time, we also see them capitalizing on industrial policy to spur innovation and diversify their business models.

Video Player is loading.
Current Time 0:00
Loaded: 0%

[00:00:05.15] Since the late 1980s, the era of hyper globalization has led to increased, global coordination across economies and a lowering of economic inequality across developed, and developing nations. However, this era has started to revert post-2020. Rising protectionism is reducing global trade and growth, creating risks to global supply chains and raising costs and inefficiencies. As such, it can also elevate policy uncertainty. And so, altogether, these global shifts should broadly increase volatility, reduce global growth, and intrench inflationary pressures.

[00:00:43.81] Well, how nations respond to the new era will likely lead to differentiated opportunities, creating investment dispersion. For example, more local investment in sectors of strategic priorities such as defense and technology in the United States is likely to create tailwinds for those areas, especially in periods of heightened geopolitical risks. And, from a global perspective, being more selective around country exposures is likely to become more important as well. For example, countries that are more focused on maintaining strong trade linkages across factions are likely to benefit from higher economic growth.

[00:01:22.42] Understanding the interlinkage between evolving geopolitical fragmentation and macroeconomic drivers is likely to present opportunities. If dispersion increases, redefining portfolio allocations across more granular exposures, as well as being nimble, should add significant value, especially in a world where volatility may start to normalize from the ultra-low levels of the prior decade.

An application from one of our investors.

Starring Michael Pensky

1. How will geopolitical fragmentation continue to affect the macro environment?
2. How will this shift create investment dispersion?
3. What does this mean for portfolios?

4.

Demographic divergence

The world is split between aging and younger economies. Aging populations in major economies are poised to limit how much countries can produce and grow. By contrast, selected emerging market economies can benefit from younger populations and growing middle classes. This demographic divergence creates potential investment opportunities and risks, in our view.

Video Player is loading.
Current Time 0:00
Loaded: 0%

[00:00:05.04] We live in a world that is aging very quickly, and entering a new regime where governments may have fewer resources at their disposal to help retirees cover their expenses. According to a 2022 World Health Organization publication, the proportion of the world’s population over 60 is projected to nearly double from 12% to 22% between 2015 and 2050. The shift away from defined benefit plans has meant that individuals are increasingly on the hook to cover their retirement spending from their savings. At the same time, savings for retirement is getting harder and harder, as people are living longer and working less. 1 in 3 people will live past 90 in the U.S. and nearly 1 in 2 are retiring earlier than planned. And so, in short, people will need to do more with less.

[00:00:57.89] The consequences are both economic and personal. From an economic standpoint, slower economic growth, driven by declining workforces, will likely lead to lower levels of productivity, lower tax receipts, and ultimately higher debt servicing costs for governments. This means governments will have fewer resources to help those in retirement. This would also put direct pressure on social safety nets, as contributions from workers to programs like social security decline. On a personal level, first, people will need to save more. Saving is inherently hard, and most people have day jobs and aren’t investment experts. We are seeing from our own 2024 Read on Retirement survey that nearly 1 in 3 Baby Boomers do not feel on track for retirement. And second, even if you do save enough, people often don’t know how to spend in retirement once they get there. And so the ultimate consequence of all this is that retirees will increasingly be on their own to figure out both how to “save for” and “spend in” retirement.

[00:02:00.87] For those with access to retirement plans, features like auto-enrollment and auto escalation can help people save early and often for retirement. Target Date Funds have also helped automate asset allocation across a lifetime, potentially taking a heavy burden away from savers. To expand access to Target Date Funds to those without workplace savings plans, BlackRock launched the iShares LifePath Target Date ETFs in 2023. However, at retirement, retirees still have not had a turnkey solution to help them spend. This is why we built LifePath Paycheck.

[00:02:32.19] The idea of LifePath Paycheck was to create a convenient way for individuals to access things like guaranteed income and then be able to spend in retirement effectively. So when we think about the retirement crisis and the retirement problem that we’re seeing, we’re trying to take simple steps like Target Date ETFs as well as more complex steps like LifePath Paycheck. But from an individual, these should come across as very simple products for them to help save for retirement.

An application from one of our investors.

Starring Nick Nefouse

1. What is the retirement crisis?
2. What are some problems and consequences?
3. How can we seek to overcome these issues?

5.

Transition to a low-carbon economy

We see the transition to a low-carbon economy having implications for macroeconomic trends and portfolios, involving a massive reallocation of resources, as supply chains, production processes, and energy systems are re-wired. Technological innovation, consumer and investor preferences for lower-carbon products, and shifts in government policies are reshaping production and consumption and spurring capital investment.

Video Player is loading.
Current Time 0:00
Loaded: 0%

[00:00:05.39] For investors who choose to, there are so many ways to facilitate or financially benefit from transition investing.

[00:00:13.81] One of the key benefits of a multi-asset approach is our ability to look across multiple trends.

[00:00:20.23] So for example, AI is a big trend that everyone is talking about. And actually, AI does tie into the transition to a low-carbon economy.

[00:00:29.52] There was recently an IEA report which said the electricity required for a ChatGPT request is 10 times that of a Google request.

[00:00:38.87] So in other words, as AI becomes more and more integrated into our everyday life, we can expect a massive reallocation of capital as energy systems are re-wired and infrastructure needs are met.

[00:00:50.95] And this is even more true when you think that electricity demand may also increase if, for example, more people choose to buy electric vehicles or hydrogen production increases.

[00:01:01.83] The fascinating part about the transition is that there are multiple ways to invest in it, from the new technologies that are scaling up, the inputs that needed to build it, to the infrastructure required to support it. As such, we have the expertise and capabilities to invest across early-stage private markets all the way through to equities and fixed income, depending on the opportunity.

[00:01:24.94] And so from a multi-asset perspective, to bring this full circle, we’re able to look across all of those trends and think through the investable opportunities, allowing our investors to access the transition using a diversified and risk aware approach.

[00:01:46.32] Some investors choose to invest thematically when it comes to low-carbon transition opportunities.

[00:01:51.88] For example, in electric vehicles or renewables.

[00:01:56.01] One thing we’ve learnt is that these themes can be sensitive to the broader market.

[00:02:00.60] So for example, if interest rates fluctuate, this can have an impact on short term performance, even if we have a constructive view on an investment.

[00:02:10.08] By taking a multi asset, top-down view across sectors, our portfolio management team aims to manage these risks as we seek to deliver a smoother financial outcome for our clients.

An application from one of our investors.

Starring Yasmin Meissner

1. Why are investors interested in transition investing?
2. What are the advantages of a multi-asset approach?
3. What are some of the challenges in relation to transition investing?

4. How do I choose the best investment firm for me?

Choosing an investment firm is by no means an easy task. Investment firms come in all shapes and sizes, and oftentimes it isn’t exactly clear what differentiates them. To help you navigate the overwhelming array of options, we've identified 2 key items to consider when choosing an investment firm: Accountability and benefits of scale.

  • A key consideration is making sure you have a clear point of contact to depend on when a “need” emerges. Throughout the investment journey, situations come up that range from the non-urgent (ex: reporting questions or longer-term investment planning inquires), to ones of medium urgency, (ex: cash needs), to ones of incredible urgency, (ex: the S&P opened down 5% - what is happening and what are you doing about it?). It is of utmost importance that in each one of these instances you have a number to call with a person at the end of the line who knows your portfolio like the back of their hand and can quickly (and confidently) address your issues. Ideally, the investment firm should also be able to fit into your operating model, allowing you and your organization the space to focus on your strengths, strategic priorities, and – most of all – to be able to identify the “needs” before the “needs” even become “needs.”

  • Size does matter, in our view. Working with a firm where you can leverage scale offers a value proposition that smaller shops simply cannot provide. A larger firms’ economies of scale, existing relationships, and global platform of individuals contributing to the client experience can offer potential benefits and opportunities that may not be obvious at first glance:

    • What tools do you gain access to based on who you choose to do business with? What technology and risk management platforms do you have on hand to help maximize efficiency, reduce transaction costs, minimize lags and provide transparency to risks?
    • What kind of relationships does this firm already have established? This includes relationships with operational partners and service providers with whom we believe you simply must do business with to be successful in today’s market environment, as well as with management teams that are excited to be working with a firm that can be actively engaged in your investment process.
    • Which thought leaders and experts are employed at the firm, and what is the reach of their investment acumen or business insights that you would now be privy to, both on a strategic and tactical level?
    • What knowledge transfers and exclusive, customizable events can you extract to either better educate your own employees in your business, or to improve upon your business/processes?
    • If investing in alternatives is appropriate for your organization, which firm has the best access to attractive opportunities? Who can get you the best pricing? Will the firm deploy resources to help with documentation, service capital calls, and perform other maintenance of the investments? And how robust is the firm’s reporting around inception to date transactions, capital calls, distributions, and capital statements?

Interested in exploring the role of multi-asset in portfolios?

Learn more about how BlackRock’s Multi-Asset Strategies and Solutions could help you achieve your specific goals and objectives.
Icon convo bubbles

Sign up to receive BlackRock's insights on multi-asset

Please click here to opt-in to receiving insight emails from BlackRock. Any data collected will be processed according to BlackRock's privacy policy. You may unsubscribe at any time.

*Required information | Read our Privacy policy

Thank you for reaching out!

A BlackRock representative will reach out shortly. In the meantime, explore our website to read insights on the markets, portfolio design and more.


Explore our insights hub