Continue the portfolio construction course with module 3, which outlines the last two steps of the portfolio construction process: 1) Benchmarking 2) Budgeting 3) Investing and 4) Monitoring.
Before investing …
The last step of the process is to monitor the portfolio’s performance
Establish a formal review process to evaluate the items outlined above
This will help assess any changes and track the portfolio’s underlying components. Once a process is set, it should be scheduled regularly for monitoring and executing against any necessary or desired updates to the portfolio. If a change has, or could potentially have a negative effect on the portfolio’s investments, the portfolio may need to be rebalanced.
What is rebalancing?
The benefits of rebalancing
Rebalancing helps to ensure that any changes in the portfolio’s asset allocation are intentional. Rather than allowing the market to make unintended changes to a portfolio’s asset allocation, rebalancing gives the financial professional an active role in taking risks that match their clients’ risk appetite.
For example, without proper vigilance, a 60% stock – 40% bond portfolio could shift to a 70% – 30% allocation with market movements. This would result in an under- or over-allocation to certain exposures. Financial professionals who rebalance their clients’ portfolios are able to better stay on track with the original objectives set in the planning process.
Are there any downsides to rebalancing?
While there are clear long-term benefits of rebalancing, financial professionals experience hesitation from clients due to the short-term drawbacks.
An annual or semi-annual re-balancing may seem counter-productive because it involves two steps that are typically avoided:
However, there are good reasons for both.
Addressing step 2: While investors may be averse to paying taxes, they are even more averse to losing money
In the below hypothetical example, take a 60% stocks – 40% bonds portfolio that started out with a $100,000 investment and was never rebalanced. In the first five years of being invested, the portfolio would have increased in value by 90%. Further, it would be worth $11,000 more than the same starting portfolio that was rebalanced annually (excluding taxes and trading costs). At the surface, that may seem like a good thing.
Source: BlackRock, The Rebalancing Act, 2018.
However, with the market downturn in 2008, the un-rebalanced portfolio would have lost $58,000 versus $42,000 as with the rebalanced portfolio. It took five years for the un-rebalanced portfolio to build its lead, and only one to lose it, and then some. What’s more, nine years later, the un-rebalanced portfolio still lagged behind. Ultimately, rebalanced portfolios can help provide a better investing experience over the long term.
Source: BlackRock, Morningstar.
Think differently
Financial professionals who are proactive about setting a due diligence process before investing, monitoring their portfolio once invested and thoughtful about making portfolio adjustments, such as rebalancing, play a big role in helping their clients meet their goals.
This concludes the third module of the portfolio construction course. Read the next module, which discusses how to rethink risk in the investment process, to continue the course.