Why the election rally could continue

In this article, Russ Koesterich discusses why the equity market rally following the U.S. presidential election could continue into year-end

Key takeaways

• U.S. equities are up 25% for the year, with a 4% gain coming from last week. While some may question the sustainability of rally from here, Russ discusses factors that could support further growth, notably seasonal strength and investor optimism over potential fiscal stimulus and regulatory relief.
• In this environment, he believes that cyclical sectors are likely to continue to lead strength, with consumer discretionary and financials companies being well positioned. Across bonds, he continues to like corporate bonds and securitized assets for the incremental yield pick-up.

With the U.S. election decided, investors moved off the sidelines and aggressively bid up stocks and other risky assets. The S&P 500 rallied 4.7% on the week, it’s best showing since October 2022.

The rally was supported by hopes for stronger growth and a lighter regulatory touch, particularly in financials. With the election and initial market reaction now behind us, what should investors expect into the end of the year? I would focus on a few themes: continued equity strength, led by cyclical stocks, and a steeper yield curve.

With the U.S. equity market up 25% year-to-date and already trading at a significant premium, both to other markets and its history, are further gains realistic? In the near-term, I think they are. In addition to consumer led growth and monetary easing, stocks could benefit from seasonal strength and optimism over additional fiscal stimulus and the prospect of regulatory relief.

Market leadership

I would expect cyclicals to continue to lead, as they have for much of the past few months. While I don’t expect a major acceleration in growth, with the economy already growing at a healthy 2.50% to 3.00%, investors may continue gravitating to companies and market segments that have operating leverage (ability to increase operating income by increasing revenue). This includes consumer discretionary firms, which led the post-election gains (see Chart 1), as well as financials. The latter group benefits not only from a stronger economy and steeper yield curve but, potentially, a less onerous regulatory environment under a Republican administration.

Chart 1

Global sector performance – 1 month (as of Nov 10, 2024)

Outside of equities, the environment for bonds and rates is also likely to be impacted, particularly for longer-term U.S. Treasuries. There are several reasons for this. Additional stimulus into an already strong economy may alter the pace and extent of future Fed interest rate cuts. And apart from monetary policy, debt funded tax cuts and/or stimulus risks adding to an already historically large U.S. fiscal deficit and the accompanying supply of Treasuries.

While bond yields have already backed up from the September low, the term-premium, i.e. additional yield investors receive as compensation for taking duration risk, remains modest by historical standards. If bond investors start to assume even larger multi-year deficits, long-term yields are likely to rise further and faster than short-term yields, creating a steeper yield-curve.

Positioning to consider

As I discussed a few months back, I would maintain a modest overweight to equities into year’s end, with an emphasis on financials, consumer discretionary and select technology names. I would fund that overweight with a smaller position in ‘defensive’ sectors, notably consumer staples. On bonds, there are still good opportunities to pick-up yield in corporate bonds, securitized and other forms of credit. That said, I’d be more cautious on long-dated Treasuries. With the bond market already struggling to absorb record supply, long duration bonds may suffer further pain in the months and years ahead.

To obtain more information on the fund(s) including the Morningstar time period ratings and standardized average annual total returns as of the most recent calendar quarter and current month end, please click on the fund tile.

The Morningstar Rating^TM for funds, or "star rating", is calculated for managed products (including mutual funds, variable annuity and variable life subaccounts, exchange-traded funds, closed-end funds, and separate accounts) with at least a three-year history. Exchange-traded funds and open-ended mutual funds are considered a single population for comparative purposes. It is calculated based on a Morningstar Risk-Adjusted Return measure (excluding any applicable sales charges) that accounts for variation in a managed product's monthly excess performance, placing more emphasis on downward variations and rewarding consistent performance. The top 10% of products in each product category receive 5 stars, the next 22.5% receive 4 stars, the next 35% receive 3 stars, the next 22.5% receive 2 stars, and the bottom 10% receive 1 star. The Overall Morningstar Rating for a managed product is derived from a weighted average of the performance figures associated with its three-, five-, and 10-year 60-119 months of total returns, and 50% 10-year rating/30% five-year rating/20% three-year rating for 120 or more months of total returns. While the 10-year overall star rating formula seems to give the most weight to the 10-year period, the most recent three-year period actually has the greatest impact because it is included in all three rating periods.